CLINICAL PRACTICE
CASE REPORT |
Cat-scratch disease
Considerations for dentistry
LOUIS MANDEL, D.D.S.,
FARISA SURATTANONT, B.S., M.S. and
REZA MIREMADI, M.D., D.D.S.
 |
ABSTRACT
|
|---|
Background. Cat-scratch disease, or CSD, results from inoculation of the gram-negative bacillus Bartonella henselae via a cats scratch. A regional lymphadenitis, which usually is cervical, develops and may progress to suppuration. It is necessary to differentiate CSD from other lymphadenopathies.
Case Description. A patient who had close contact with a cat subsequently developed a localized, suppurative cervical lymphadenitis. As B. henselae was identified in 1992, the authors were able to confirm the existence of CSD serologically. Surgical drainage resulted in a successful resolution of the disease process.
Clinical Implications. As patients with CSD may be seen in the dental office, an awareness of its symptomatology can prevent unnecessary dental intervention and facilitate early treatment.
Patients with submandibular swellings often are examined in dental offices because a dental etiology is suspected. Many of these submandibular swellings represent lymphadenopathies. Proper diagnosis requires an ability to differentiate the many causes, which include oral sepsis, skin infections, tuberculosis, leukemia, neoplasms and cat-scratch disease, or CSD. Familiarity with these diverse processes is incumbent on the dentist. Thorough examinations and laboratory investigations usually lead to a diagnosis. Diagnosing CSD, however, is problematic because it masquerades as other causes of cervical lymphadenopathy.
Diagnosing cat-scratch disease is problematic because it masquerades as other causes of cervical lymphadenopathy.
It is estimated that 70,000 new cases of CSD occur each year.1 Although systemic manifestations have been reported, CSD generally is considered to be a benign, self-limiting, granulomatous, suppurative regional lymphadenitis. Cats are a natural reservoir for the causative microorganism. Because infected cats rapidly develop antibodies, they appear healthy despite a bacteremia that can be present for at least 12 months.24 A positive serology has been reported in up to 56 percent of North American cats.3 The etiologic organism, transmitted to humans by a cats scratch, lick or bite, was identified in 1992 by Regnery and colleagues5 as the gram-negative bacillus Bartonella henselae.
Because some patients who have CSD will be examined in the dental office, we present a case report and review of CSD to heighten dentists awareness of signs, symptoms and methods of diagnosis.
 |
CASE REPORT
|
|---|
A healthy 4-year-old girl was referred to the Salivary Gland Center at Columbia University School of Dental and Oral Surgery in New York City by the pediatric emergency clinic at Columbia University because of a left submandibular swelling (Figure 1
). A tentative diagnosis of submandibular sialadenitis had been made.
The submandibular mass had developed 10 days earlier. Its gradual increase in size precipitated the girls parents concern and was the impetus for the hospital visit. At the time of the examination, the mass was approximately 4 centimeters in diameter, and the overlying skin was mildly erythematous. Palpation of the swelling indicated that it was superficially placed, circumscribed, tender and fluctuant. There was no associated cervical lymphadenopathy or fever.
No trismus was present, and an intraoral examination revealed that the dentition was caries-free. There was no indication of any oral sepsis. We exerted extraoral pressure on the left submandibular salivary gland and noted a clear and adequate salivary flow exiting from the orifice of the left Whartons duct, thus effectively ruling out sialadenitis. A panoramic radiograph showed a normal dentition and no etiologic cause for the swelling. We prescribed penicillin.
When we questioned the girls mother, she indicated that the child had returned one month earlier from a four-week summer vacation. On the girls return, she had some scratches and a "large pimple," involving her left check and neck, which were gone when we examined her. The mother also indicated that the girl had played constantly with a pet kitten while on vacation. It was the kitten that was responsible for the scratches that were observed by the mother on the girls return.
A computed tomographic, or CT, scan or CI, revealed an enlarged, superficially located ovoid mass with a central necrotic area and a periphery of increased density (Figure 2
). The submandibular salivary gland was normal in appearance but displaced slightly medially. We made a diagnosis of a suppurative enlarged lymph node. In view of the history, we thought that CSD was the cause.

View larger version (166K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2. Computed tomographic scan of the submandibular area. Left submandibular salivary gland (S) has been displaced medially. Note enlarged suppurative lymph node (arrows) with rim of increased density and central lucent area (A) representing pus accumulation. Because of head tilt, inferior border of mandible (M) is not symmetrically positioned.
| |
Five days later, we administered an intravenous sedative and a local anesthetic to the patient before we incised the fluctuant area. We evacuated 2 cubic centimeters of pus. A culture of the pus failed to produce any aerobic or anaerobic growth, and we saw no organisms on a smear of pus. We diagnosed an incisional biopsy of the tissue surrounding the abscess cavity as a soft-tissue abscess wall with no signs of neoplasm. We ordered a Warthin-Starry silver staina non-specific silver stainbut were not able to identify any microorganisms.
While the patient was sedated, we drew blood for a serologic examination. The specimen was sent to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or CDC, along with a presumed diagnosis of CSD. The CDC identified antibodies to B. henselae with a titer of 1:128 (normal < 1:64).
A significant improvement in the patients condition was evident when she returned two days later for postoperative care. We discontinued her penicillin use, which we had started seven days earlier at the time of the first visit. One week later, wound closure with the absence of drainage was evident.
The patient failed to return for further visits, but follow-up phone calls revealed that the wound had healed uneventfully.
 |
DISCUSSION
|
|---|
In the case report that we discuss in this article, a medical history in a healthy child revealed no systemic diseases (neoplasm, tuberculosis, leukemia and so forth) that could be related to cervical lymphadenopathy. Furthermore, a suppurative lymphadenitis is unusual in such conditions. Because we had eliminated the oral cavity and submandibular salivary gland as instigators of the swelling, we searched for another infective cause.
When children and young adults are seen with a regional lymphadenitis, suspicion regarding the presence of CSD should be aroused. Because hugging a cat involves the cats being close to the persons facial and cervical areas, scratches in these anatomical locations can result in a cervical lymphadenopathy whose size can approach 10 cm. The lymphadenopathy develops when the infectious organism is transported by macrophages from the site of inoculation to a regional lymph node. Within seven to 12 days, a pustule or papule appears at the site of the scratch. It soon heals, only to be followed by enlargement of the lymph node five to 50 days later.6 Spontaneous resolution of the lymphadenitis usually occurs over a period of weeks or months, but 10 to 35 percent of the infected nodes progress to suppuration.2,7,8
Serology has proven to be a reliable method of diagnosing cat-scratch disease.
Infected patients may experience mild fever, fatigue, malaise and headaches, but these symptoms often are not present. However, more serious systemic manifestationssuch as parotitis, osteomyelitis, hepatosplenomegaly and a variety of neurological conditions4,9,10have been reported to occur in 15 percent of the patients.11
Serology has proven to be a reliable method of diagnosing CSD, and it is performed by the CDC using an indirect immunofluorescent antibody, or IFA, assay. If CSD is present, high titers of antibody will react to the B. henselae antigen. Titers of 1:64 and higher are considered positive. Our patients history, clinical examination and CT scan led us to make a tentative diagnosis of CSD. Final diagnosis, however, required the serologic results reported by the CDC.
In the past, a diagnosis of CSD was based on a history of contact with a cat, elimination of other causes of a lymphadenopathy and a characteristic pathological picture. Clinically early in the disease process, a granulomatous infiltration of a lymph node is present, followed by the development of necrosis. The Warthin-Starry silver stain can be used to highlight the culpable organism. In our case, B. henselae could not be cultured nor was it uncovered by the stain, and the pathological tissue specimen was not diagnostic. With the development of a specific IFA assay, serology has become the gold standard for the diagnosis of CSD.
The serologic test for CSD is positive in 90 percent of the patients.12 Elevated serum titers can be found one to three weeks after the onset of the illness. The titers continue to rise for the first eight weeks and then gradually decrease over the next several months.13 Because of its practicality and accuracy, the IFA assay has been accepted as the best diagnostic technique. Culturing of B. henselae is time-consuming, and its isolation and growth often are not successful.2 Although a polymerase chain reaction test is available, appropriate laboratory facilities and equipment are required. Because histopathologic diagnosis demands a surgical approach, the alternative and less aggressive diagnostic modalities seem to be the way to go.
Most of the enlarged lymph nodes will resolve spontaneously over several months.14,15 Antibiotics usually are not necessary,2,16 as the causative organism does not respond well to such therapy. Antibiotics are indicated in those few cases in which spread to systemic organs has occurred. A definitive antibiotic protocol has not been established, but gentamicin,2 azithromycin,16 penicillin,17 ciprofloxacin14 and rifampin18 have been suggested.
When suppuration occurs, it is necessary to evacuate the pus. In the reported case, we made an incision, but we did not place a drain, because we wanted to avoid impeding the healing of the wound margins and to diminish scar formation. However, we no longer would advocate this therapeutic approach, as such an incision may lead to the development of a persistent sinus with significant scar formation. To negate this outcome, needle aspiration can be used. The needle is introduced best through the skin 1 to 2 cm away from the localized swelling. It then can be tunneled in a horizontal plane toward the fluctuation area, and the pus can be aspirated.12,16 Repeat aspirations may be necessary to achieve success.
 |
CONCLUSION
|
|---|
Patients with submandibular lymph node swellings are seen in dental offices. CSD should be considered among the possible causes of such swellings. The causative organism B. henselae has been identified, and an accurate serologic test has been devised. Knowledge of the disease will facilitate its diagnosis and treatment.

View larger version (132K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Dr. Mandel is the director, Salivary Gland Center; clinical professor, division of oral and maxillofacial surgery; and an assistant dean, Columbia University School of Dental and Oral Surgery, 630 West 168th St., New York, N.Y. 10032. Address reprint requests to Dr. Mandel.
| |

View larger version (135K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Ms. Surattanont is a research assistant, Salivary Gland Center; and a senior dental student, Columbia University School of Dental and Oral Surgery, New York.
| |

View larger version (130K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Dr. Miremadi is a senior resident, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, New York-Presbyterian Hospitals, New York.
| |
 |
REFERENCES
|
|---|
- Steiner M, Gould A, Wilkie W, Porter K. Cat-scratch disease in the submandibular region: report of a case. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994;52(6):6148.[Medline]
- Maurin M, Birtles R, Raoult D. Current knowledge of Bartonella species. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1997;16(7):487506.[Medline]
- Haimerl M, Tenter AM, Simon K, Rommel M, Hilger J, Autenrieth IB. Seroprevalence of Bartonella henselae in cats in Germany. J Med Microbiol 1999;48(9):84956.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Maguina C, Gotuzzo E. Bartonellosis: new and old. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2000;14(1):122.[Medline]
- Regnery RL, Olson JG, Perkins BA, Bibb W. Serological response to "Rochalimaea henselae" antigen in suspected cat-scratch disease. Lancet 1992;339(8807):14435.[Medline]
- Case records of the Massachusetts General Hospital. Weekly clinicopathological exercises: case 14-1999a nine-year-old girl with fever and cervical lymphadenopathy. N Engl J Med 1999;340(19):14917.[Free Full Text]
- Garcia CJ, Flores PA, Arce JD, Chuaqui B, Schwartz DS. Ultra-sonography in the study of salivary gland lesions in children. Pediatr Radiol 1998;28(6):41825.[Medline]
- Kelly CS, Kelly RE. Lymphadenopathy in children. Pediatr Clin North Am 1998;45(4):87588.[Medline]
- Case records of the Massachusetts General Hospital. Weekly clinicopathological exercises: case 22-1992a 6
-year-old girl with status epilepticus cervical lymphadenopathy, pleural effusions, and respiratory distress. N Engl J Med 1992;326(22):14809.[Medline]
- Adal KA, Cockerell CJ, Petri WA. Cat scratch disease, bacillary angiomatosis, and other infections due to Rochalimaea. N Engl J Med 1994;330(21):150915.[Free Full Text]
- Ratner LM, Kesack E, McCauley TR, Disler DG. Disseminated Bartonella henselae (cat-scratch disease): appearance of multifocal osteomyelitis with MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;171(4): 11645.[Free Full Text]
- Smith DL. Cat-scratch disease and related clinical syndromes. Am Fam Phys 1997;55(5):17839.[Medline]
- Case records of the Massachusetts General Hospital. Weekly clinicopathological exercises: case 1-1998an 11-year-old boy with a seizure. N Engl J Med 1998;338(2):1129.[Free Full Text]
- Joseph BK, Savage NW, Macleod AW. Cat-scratch disease: a case report. Quintessence Int 1999;30(4):2635.[Medline]
- Not T, Canciani M, Buratti E, et al. Serologic response to Bartonella henselae in patients with cat scratch disease and in sick and healthy children. Acta Paediatr 1999;88(3):2849.[Medline]
- Walterspiel JN. Treatment of cat scratch disease. N Engl J Med 1999;340(23):18423.[Medline]
- Dolan MJ, Wong MT, Regnery RL, et al. Syndrome of Rochalimaea henselae adenitis suggesting cat scratch disease. Ann Intern Med 1993;118(5):3316.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Arisoy ES, Correa AG, Wagner ML, Kaplan SL. Hepatosplenic cat-scratch disease in children: selected clinical features and treatment. Clin Infect Dis 1999;28(4):77884.[Medline]