The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 132, No 11, 1503.
© 2001 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hamilton, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Dennison, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hamilton, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Dennison, J. B.

LETTERS

Authors’ response

Dr. Hays may have misunderstood our conclusion, which was, "Judged on the basis of the weight of the preparation impression (a surrogate measure of volume), there was no benefit gained from early treatment of questionable carious lesions." That is, tooth structure was not conserved by early treatment.

We are not recommending that carious lesions into dentin not be diagnosed and treated, but in our study, early treatment led to 56 percent of those teeth being treated unnecessarily by current standards. This can be viewed as a needless expense in terms of the patient’s time and, in a fee-for-service environment, the patient’s money.

Equally important is the necessity of continued maintenance1,2 of these restorations, which will lead to additional losses. There is also the unnecessary loss of tooth structure in 56 percent of the teeth treated, which carries some ethical considerations.

Considering the volume of tooth structure lost due to the unnecessary early operative intervention (not analyzed in our study) of 56 percent of the teeth, it is felt that additional tooth structure was lost, not conserved, by early treatment. This is a major negative factor for the patient, without any proven benefit.


   REFERENCES
 TOP
 REFERENCES
 
  1. Romcke RG, Lewis DW, Maze BD, Vickerson RA. Retention and maintenance of fissure sealants over 10 years. J Can Dent Assoc 1990;56(3):235–7.

  2. Wendt LK, Koch G, Birkhed D. Replacements of restorations in the primary and young permanent dentition. Swed Dent J 1998;22(4):149–55.[Medline]



James C. Hamilton, D.D.S., Assistant Professor and Joseph B. Dennison, D.D.S., M.S., Professor

Department of Cariology, Restorative Sciences and Endodontics, University of Michigan, School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hamilton, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Dennison, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hamilton, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Dennison, J. B.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS