The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 131, No 7, 977-979.
© 2000 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HUGHES, T. E.
Right arrow Articles by STRASSLER, H. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HUGHES, T. E.
Right arrow Articles by STRASSLER, H. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Esthestics

CLINICAL DIRECTIONS

MINIMIZING EXCESSIVE COMPOSITE RESIN WHEN FABRICATING FIBER-REINFORCED SPLINTS



THOMAS E. HUGHES, D.D.S. and HOWARD E. STRASSLER, D.M.D.

Teeth that are periodontally compromised with loss of attachment and bone height often have increasing levels of mobility. Recent research supports the use of tooth stabilization and splinting to improve the prognosis.1 There are three primary indications for splinting periodontally involved teeth:

– primary occlusal trauma;
– secondary occlusal trauma;
– progressive mobility, migration or pain on function.2

In recent years, conservative splinting involving the use of continuous, woven-fiber reinforcement has been described and has become a well-accepted technique.37

One problem associated with the use of fiber reinforcement with composite resin for directly placed periodontal splints is the composite resin excess that flows into the interproximal gingival spaces. Even using wooden wedges to minimize the excess may not completely solve the problem. In some cases, the gingival spaces of periodontally involved teeth are larger than even the largest wooden wedge. Also, wedges do not completely adapt to the shape of the embrasure space and can lock into the composite resin after polymerization, making it difficult to remove the wedge.

Excess composite resin is difficult to remove from the crown and root surfaces after light-curing. Accomplishing this may require the use of a finishing bur or diamond on a high-speed handpiece, which has the potential to notch the root surface and can be uncomfortable for the patient if the teeth are not anesthetized. One technique that is less hazardous involves the use of a reciprocating handpiece (Profin, Dentatus USA) with thin-bladed lamineer abrasive tips.

We propose a block-out technique to minimize excesses and cleanup of composite resin when placing direct bonded fiber-reinforced composite resin splints. The technique involves the use of an elastomeric impression material placed into the gingival spaces between the teeth below the contact area. It is critical that the teeth be etched before this block-out technique is used.

THE TECHNIQUE
When placing the splint, clinicians need to isolate the field. This can be accomplished with a rubber dam or with the placement of absorbents. After determining the length of reinforcement ribbon needed for the splint and cutting the ribbon to the chosen width and length, the dentist thoroughly cleans the teeth of plaque and stain using pumice with a prophylaxis cup. The interproximal surfaces are cleaned with sandpaper finishing strips or diamond abrasive strips. Any additional tooth preparations are then completed. This can include the placement of a channel on the lingual or facial surface of the teeth.

The teeth are etched with a phosphoric acid etchant for 30 seconds, rinsed with water and dried. The elastomeric impression material is then syringed into the inter-proximal spaces below the proximal contact areas. Although any elastomeric impression material can be used and placed with an impression syringe, we have found that a heavy-bodied automix polysiloxane impression material is the easiest to use. Medium-bodied polyether impression materials also work well. In either case, the impression material will be completely set within four minutes. Whichever impression material is selected, it is important that the teeth be etched and dried before the block-out material is placed to avoid trapping moisture that could contaminate the bonding procedure.

Before placing the impression material between the teeth, clinicians should be careful to keep the material below the proximal contacts to avoid flow into these spaces, which might hamper placement of adhesive and composite resin during the fabrication of the splint. Also, they should verify that the impression material has completely blocked out areas to avoid an excess of composite resin that would have to be removed during curing and finishing. Any misplaced impression material can be removed easily with a scalpel and a No. 12 blade.

In cases in which the area can be kept isolated and dry without the rubber dam, the impression material can be placed as a continuous wash around the teeth and soft tissues. Lip retractors are used to isolate the teeth to be splinted, and the automix polysiloxane impression material is placed into the gingival embrasures and covers the adjacent soft tissues to block out these spaces (Figure 1Go). Use of a rubber dam will make the gingival embrasures smaller. In such cases, the impression material is placed in each interproximal gingival embrasure space (Figure 2Go).



View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Using lip expander isolation, the clinician places polysiloxane impression material to block out the gingival interproximal embrasure spaces and cover the soft tissues.

 


View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. With the rubber dam in place, a heavy-bodied polysiloxane impression material is used to block out each gingival embrasure space in the mandibular anterior teeth to be splinted.

 
After the block-out material is removed, the amount of excessive composite resin in the gingival embrasure spaces is significantly less than would be present had wooden wedges been used (Figure 3Go). Another benefit of this technique is that the rigidity of the impression material stabilizes the teeth to be splinted during the restorative procedure.



View larger version (72K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. The completed reinforced splint (Ribbond reinforcement ribbon, Ribbond) after the impression material has been removed shows that little finishing is needed in the gingival embrasure spaces to remove the excess composite resin.

 
CONCLUSION
When using a block-out technique with elastomeric impression material during the placement of a direct adhesive, composite resin, fiber-reinforced splint, the clinician will need to perform only minimal finishing and polishing of excessive composite resin in the gingival embrasure spaces. For the patient, this translates to less root sensitivity during the finishing phase of the restorative procedure, and for the clinician, less chair time.

DO YOU HAVE A TIP TO SHARE?
Do you have a time- or work-saving clinical technique to share with your colleagues? Submit it to JADA’s Clinical Directions department. A Clinical Directions item should be a maximum of two double-spaced typed pages and should include no more than one figure or illustration. Submit items to Clinical Directions, JADA, 211 E. Chicago Ave., Chicago, Ill. 60611.

FOOTNOTES

Dr. Hughes is in private practice, 1880 Willow Park Way, Monument, Colo. 80132, e-mail "cme4smiles{at}aol.com". Address reprint requests to Dr. Hughes.


Dr. Strassler is a professor and director of Operative Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, University of Maryland Dental School, Baltimore.


Dr. Strassler is a paid consultant to Dentatus USA, manufacturer of the reciprocating handpiece mentioned in this article.

REFERENCES

  1. McGuire MK, Nunn ME. Prognosis versus actual outcome. II. The effectiveness of clinical parameters in developing an accurate prognosis. J Periodontal 1996;67:658–65.

  2. Tarnow DP, Fletcher P. Splinting of periodontally involved teeth: indications and contraindications. N Y State Dent J 1986;52(5):24–5.

  3. Strassler HE, Serio FG. Stabilization of the natural dentition in periodontal cases using adhesive restorative materials. Periodontal Insights 1997;4(3):4–10.

  4. Miller TE. A new material for periodontal splinting and orthodontic retention. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1993;14(6):800–12.

  5. Christensen G. Reinforcement fibers for splinting teeth. Clin Res Associates Newsletter 1997;21(10):1–2.

  6. Strassler HE, Scherer W, LoPresti J, Rudo D. Long term clinical evaluation of a woven polyethylene ribbon used for tooth stabilization and splinting. J Isr Orthod0 Soc 1997;5(3):11–5.

  7. Iniguez I, Strassler HE. Polyethylene ribbon and fixed orthodontic retention and porcelain veneers: solving an esthetic dilemma. J Esthet Dent 1998;10:52–9.[Medline]





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HUGHES, T. E.
Right arrow Articles by STRASSLER, H. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HUGHES, T. E.
Right arrow Articles by STRASSLER, H. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Esthestics


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS