The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 131, No 7, 919-926.
© 2000 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ISRAEL, H. A.
Right arrow Articles by SCRIVANI, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by ISRAEL, H. A.
Right arrow Articles by SCRIVANI, S. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Pharmacology

CLINICAL PRACTICE

CASE REPORT

THE INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH TO ORAL, FACIAL AND HEAD PAIN



HOWARD A. ISRAEL, D.D.S. and STEVEN J. SCRIVANI, D.D.S., D.SC.


   ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 Chronic orofacial pain.
 CASE REPORTS
 APPLYING THE INTERDISCIPLINARY...
 SUMMARY
 REFERENCES
 
Background. Chronic oral, facial and head pain is a common clinical problem, and appropriate diagnosis and management are a challenge for health care professionals. Patients often will first seek the care of dentists because of the pain’s localization in the oral cavity and surrounding structures. This article emphasizes the importance of establishing accurate diagnoses and conducting appropriate triage of the patient with complex orofacial pain.

Case Descriptions. The authors present two case reports illustrating the complex nature of oral, facial and head pain, and the potential and actual pitfalls in management of this condition. These representative cases demonstrate how orofacial pain—which appears to be localized in the peripheral dental and oral structures—can have extremely complex etiologies involving other anatomical structures, the central nervous system and psychological factors. The reports point to the need for the expertise of a number of specialists in such cases.

Clinical Implications. If the symptoms and clinical findings do not appear to be consistent with typical oral disease, or if standard treatments do not alleviate the pain, the dental clinician must consider other, more complex orofacial pain diagnoses. The dental professional should not hesitate to make referrals to key specialists or to members of an interdisciplinary team at a pain treatment center who have the expertise to appropriately diagnose and manage chronic oral, facial and head pain.

Pain is a complex, individual experience that combines the perception of, interpretation of, modulation of and reaction to a stimulus. The International Association for the Study of Pain defines pain as "an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage or described in terms of such damage."1 The stimulus usually is noxious and sometimes causes tissue damage. Nociception is the neurophysiological term that describes the way in which noxious stimuli are detected by the body. However, a person may perceive a stimulus to be noxious even if no tissue damage occurs. Numerous factors modify the way in which noxious stimuli are perceived and the reactive behavior that follows. These factors include a person’s emotional, physiological and psychological state; experience; motivation; and cognition. All of these factors will greatly influence whether a person describes a stimulus as "painful."

Nociceptive input is processed in the brainstem and follows several paths for modulation and interpretation by other brainstem regions, subcortical and cortical areas. Most nociceptive input is processed via the spinothalamic tract to primary relay areas of the thalamus and on to the primary somatosensory cortex. Other pathways of processing involve the reticular formations and the limbic structures, including the cingulate gyrus, frontal areas, amygdala and hypothalamus. The cortex supplies the nociceptive afferent experience, while the limbic structures add emotions, instinct, drives, autonomic activity and learned experiences to the total pain experience. The normal and sometimes abnormal neurophysiology and neurochemistry of the central nervous system mediate the neural activity and the neural changes that take place with chronic pain conditions. These multiple connections of pain pathways in the brain and their complex physiology account for the complexity of the pain experience (suffering) and the pain behavior that follows. This also makes diagnosis and treatment of chronic pain conditions very challenging, even for the most experienced clinicians.

The biopsychosocial model of disease emphasizes how the combination of somatosensory and psychosocial input influences a patient’s response to acute pain, and how a chronic stimulus contributes to the suffering and pain behavior commonly demonstrated in chronic pain conditions.2,3 As pain conditions become chronic, neurophysiological and psychological changes take place, leading to changes in pain perception and pain behavior.4,5 The chronicity of symptoms in pain disorders has led many authors to associate specific behavioral patterns with chronic pain.2,5 In 1955, Moulton6 identified two types of patients with chronic pain. Some patients were overly dependent on someone who was either inadequate, overdominant or unapproachable, causing the patient with chronic pain to be angry and hostile. Other patients who were very competent, obsessive and domineering became secretly angry and hostile. The characteristics displayed by many chronic pain patients included the following:

– a high level of stress and anxiety;
– a marked tendency toward drug tolerance and dependence;
– dependence on family, friends and doctors;
– loss of self-esteem, apathy and withdrawal behavior;
– increasing anger and hostility.

Psychiatric comorbidity is found commonly in chronic pain conditions. Depression and anxiety disorders in relation to chronic pain conditions have been studied extensively, and theories on pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment have been proposed.710 Specifically with regard to facial pain, comorbidity with depression, anxiety and a history of physical or sexual abuse has been documented clearly in several case series.9,1113 Additional psychiatric disorders that are frequently associated with pain conditions are the somatoform disorders and personality disorders.14

In light of the complexity of the biopsychosocial model of pain, it is important that clinicians recognize and identify all of the concomitant conditions that influence chronic pain disorders, so that a correct diagnosis can be made and optimum treatment provided. Given the complexity of the condition of chronic pain, care must be taken that the pain control methods chosen—whether pharmacological, behavioral, physical, psychological or surgical—either eliminate or modify the pain experience and the pain behavior, without altering other aspects of normal human behavior and the human condition.


   Chronic orofacial pain.
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 Chronic orofacial pain.
 CASE REPORTS
 APPLYING THE INTERDISCIPLINARY...
 SUMMARY
 REFERENCES
 
Orofacial pain is an extremely common, multifactorial pain disorder. According to a 1989 survey, an estimated 39 million adults in the U.S. civilian population (approximately 22 percent of the population) had experienced orofacial pain more than once during the preceding six months.15 Although the most common type of orofacial pain is related to dental pathology (12.2 percent of the U.S. population), pain involving other regions of the head and neck—including the temporomandibular joint, or TMJ (5.3 percent of the U.S. population), and the face and cheek (1.4 percent)—also have a high prevalence. A recent study that involved random sampling of 5,860 households of older adults (aged 65 years and older) revealed that 17.4 percent had had orofacial pain symptoms within the past year.16 Another recent study demonstrated the most common facial pain conditions to include temporomandibular joint disorders, or TMD; phantom tooth pain; and burning mouth.17 These disorders provide challenging diagnostic dilemmas for dentists; however, epidemiologic data in the literature have been useful in providing the diagnostic criteria for these conditions.17

The annual cost to society related to chronic pain is extremely high, involving health care services, loss of work, decreased productivity and disability compensation. In the United States, this cost of chronic pain is estimated to be approximately $80 billion per year, with as much as 40 percent being linked to orofacial pain disorders.18,19

The diagnosis and management of orofacial pain disorders are extremely complex and have been fraught with much controversy. This may be caused in part by the extremely complex anatomy involved with the facial region, the numerous disciplines that may be involved with the diagnosis and management of orofacial pain conditions and the complexity involved in the science of pain disorders in general. A 1996 National Institutes of Health Technology Assessment Conference on the management of orofacial pain and TMD concluded that the diagnostic classification for orofacial pain and TMD was inadequate, and that long-term, randomized controlled trials concerning the efficacy of a variety of treatment approaches have been inadequate.20 Another conclusion by the panel at this conference was that multidisciplinary collaborations among a number of disciplines in the basic and applied sciences will be necessary to further advance our knowledge of the proper diagnosis and treatment of these conditions.

On a more practical level, there are a great number of people who are suffering from acute and chronic orofacial pain who first visit their dentists in need of diagnosis and management. If the pain is due to dental pathology, interventions by the dental team most commonly will result in resolution of symptoms. However, if the pain persists or reoccurs, the diagnosis of dental pathology becomes questionable. These patients typically will see numerous health care providers from a variety of disciplines in an attempt to obtain appropriate diagnosis and treatment and, thereby, relieve symptoms.

Chronic oral, facial and head pain may be due to any of a variety of conditions:

– neurogenic pain disorders (such as trigeminal neuralgia or postherpetic neuralgia);
– primary headache disorders (such as migraine or cluster headaches or cranial arteritis);
– intracranial pain disorders (such as neoplasm or aneurysm);
– intraoral pain disorders (such as odontogenic or mucosal disorders);
– pain disorders involving associated structures (such as otologic disease or disorders of the paranasal sinuses or salivary glands);
– musculoskeletal disorders (such as TMJ pathology—osteoarthritis, synovitis or neoplasia—or myofascial pain or dysfunction);
– psychological disorders (such as anxiety, depression or post-traumatic stress disorder).

Pain management is extremely difficult and must be based on well-founded diagnoses. All too frequently, there is misdiagnosis or, worse, no diagnosis, often leading to multiple treatments that are ineffective or potentially harmful.


   CASE REPORTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 Chronic orofacial pain.
 CASE REPORTS
 APPLYING THE INTERDISCIPLINARY...
 SUMMARY
 REFERENCES
 
The following case reports demonstrate the extreme complexity of oral, facial and head pain. These reports show how the treating clinicians encountered potential and actual pitfalls in the management of such pain. They also demonstrate how patients with orofacial pain can have a variety of diagnoses that cross multiple disciplines, requiring the expertise of an interdisciplinary team of specialists to establish accurate diagnoses and proper management. Finally, these case reports also illustrate how earlier collaboration with practitioners in a number of specialties can greatly improve our ability to diagnose and treat these conditions. Case 1 is an example of how earlier referral to an interdisciplinary team of specialists would have greatly enhanced a patient’s course of treatment.

Case 1. A 30-year-old woman visited an oral and maxillofacial surgeon at Columbia University, New York, in 1994, complaining of bilateral jaw joint pain, headaches and jaw locking. She reported that she had been in a motor vehicle accident in 1987, in which she had suffered multiple injuries, including a complex fracture of the clavicle. The patient reported that this required several operations by orthopedic and plastic and reconstructive surgeons, and she had healed poorly.

In February 1994, she had developed increasing jaw pain and locking and was seen by a dentist with expertise in TMD. He prescribed a full course of conservative treatment, including an oral appliance, muscle relaxants, anti-inflammatory drugs, moist heat and a soft diet. Conservative management was continued over the course of nine months; however, the symptoms continued at a high level. The clinical examination revealed limitation of mandibular movement with an interincisal opening distance of 29 millimeters, a right lateral excursion of 10 mm and a left lateral excursion of 5 mm. All movements were associated with significant right and left TMJ pain. Magnetic resonance imaging, or MRI, revealed bilateral anterior disk displacements.

The diagnosis of internal derangement of the TMJs with bilateral synovitis was established clinically. As the patient continued to have severe symptoms with conservative management, an oral and maxillofacial surgeon performed bilateral surgical arthroscopies in November 1994. This revealed bilateral synovitis and adhesions and osteoarthritis of the right TMJ (Figure 1Go). The surgeon lysed the adhesions and injected betamethasone under direct vision into the inflamed synovial membranes.



View larger version (112K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Arthroscopic view of the right temporomandibular joint, demonstrating significant osteoarthritis of the articular eminence (black arrow) and disk (outlined arrow).

 
After surgery, the oral and maxillofacial surgeon and the treating dentist prescribed passive-motion jaw exercises and physical therapy and instructed the patient to continue her conservative preoperative regimen. For several weeks her symptoms were reduced. Then they returned and increased, with localization directly in the right TMJ. A diagnostic arthroscopic examination of the right TMJ in December 1994 revealed significant fibrosis, which the oral and maxillofacial surgeon arthroscopically lysed again. The patient’s symptoms remained at a high level, with decreased mandibular opening in the range of 15 to 18 mm. The surgeon and the dentist added biofeedback to her treatment regimen and obtained a rheumatology consultation, which did not reveal any systemic pathology.

For a short time, the symptoms diminished. However, after a miscarriage in March 1995, her symptoms increased significantly. In May 1995, because of severe pain, the patient was admitted to Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, for pain management and further diagnostic work-up. She was placed on patient-controlled analgesic therapy for pain management. MRI scans revealed that in the right TMJ, the disk was displaced anteriorly without reduction, and the posterior band was enlarged (Figure 2Go). Because of the severe pain and limitation of motion, and the failure of conservative measures to improve the patient’s condition, the dentist and the oral and maxillofacial surgeon thought that perhaps there was a mechanical obstruction in the right TMJ due to fibrosis and disk displacement. The patient underwent right TMJ arthroplasty with diskoplasty and diskal repositioning. The preoperative interincisal opening distance under general anesthesia was 33 mm with deviation to the right, and the postoperative interincisal opening distance was 44 mm. The patient’s immediate postoperative course was unremarkable.



View larger version (118K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Magnetic resonance image of the right temporomandibular joint with anterior disk displacement and bulging of the disk’s posterior band.

 
Two weeks after surgery, the patient came to the emergency room complaining that her "wound opened up" after an episode of nausea and vomiting. Clinical examination revealed wound dehiscence without any evidence of infection. Cultures were obtained and proved to be negative. The wound was closed and irrigated, and the patient was placed on a regimen of 300 mg of clindamycin three times per day. Two weeks later, the patient returned with further dehiscence of the wound (Figure 3Go), at which time she was admitted to Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center for chronic wound infection and dehiscence, and for further work-up. Cultures were obtained (for aerobic, anaerobic, viral, fungal and acid-fast bacteria), all of which were negative. A rheumatology consult was obtained and results of all blood tests for a connective-tissue disorder were negative. Wound dressings were placed, but the patient indicated that they were uncomfortable and that she would redress the wound. Complex taping of the wound dressing and an injunction to the patient against changing her own dressing resulted in appropriate wound healing. A psychiatric consult was obtained and a diagnosis of factitious illness with self-manipulation of the wound was established. The patient was discharged and underwent extensive psychiatric treatment. Her wound healed uneventfully, and the interincisal opening distance increased to 33 mm.



View larger version (82K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Postoperative wound dehiscence that could not be attributed to infection or systemic disease. Psychiatric evaluation revealed factitious illness with self-manipulation of the wound.

 
Two years later, in October 1997, the patient returned with significant ecchymosis in the region of the right TMJ, increased pain and decreased jaw opening. Apparently, she had discontinued her psychiatric care. She was again admitted to Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center for interdisciplinary evaluation and pain management.

Comment. This case clearly illustrates how psychiatric disease can affect chronic facial pain. This patient had a combination of significant TMJ pathology and major psychiatric pathology, which made diagnosis and treatment very difficult. During the earlier stages of treatment, the treating clinicians saw no apparent evidence of any psychiatric illness, anxiety or depression. However, the patient did have significant psychiatric pathology, and an earlier evaluation of her psychological and social profile by specialists would have been appropriate. Had an interdisciplinary team been involved in the evaluation of this patient from the beginning, some of the extensive treatment likely could have been avoided.

Case 2. A 48-year-old woman visited an oral and maxillofacial surgeon at Columbia University in 1998, complaining of severe left-sided facial pain. She indicated that the pain had begun 12 days earlier and felt like a severe shock in her upper left molars. She reported that these episodes of sharp pain lasted several seconds and occurred approximately 10 to 20 times throughout the day. The painful episodes were not triggered by light touch or wind, nor were they associated with any tearing or nasal discharge. Certain movements of her jaw and chewing would sometimes trigger these painful episodes. Her medical history was unremarkable, and she denied taking any medications or having any allergies.

Clinical examination revealed the neck and oral soft tissues to be within normal limits. The TMJs were not tender and had a normal range of motion. Cranial nerve examination revealed an area of paresthesia following the distribution of the left infraorbital branch of the trigeminal nerve. The remainder of the examination yielded nothing remarkable, and no dental pathology was clinically evident. A panoramic radiograph, too, appeared unremarkable.

Based on the history and clinical examination, the surgeon made a tentative diagnosis of trigeminal neuralgia. The patient was placed on a regimen of 300 mg of gabapentin three times a day and given a follow-up appointment for one week later. By that time, her facial pain symptoms had subsided significantly, and she was tolerating the gabapentin well. However, because an intracranial lesion sometimes can cause trigeminal neuralgia with compression on the trigeminal nerve, the surgeon decided to obtain an MRI scan of the brain. The results of the scan revealed a large acoustic neuroma of the left brainstem (Figure 4Go). The patient was referred to a neurological surgeon, who subsequently performed a craniotomy and surgically removed the acoustic neuroma. After removal of this tumor, the patient’s pain symptoms resolved, and she is currently free of disease.



View larger version (117K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Magnetic resonance imaging, or MRI, of the brain of a 48-year-old woman with severe, shocklike, left-sided facial pain. Clinical examination revealed paresthesia involving the distribution of the left infraorbital nerve. An MRI scan (shown here) revealed an acoustic neuroma.

 
Comment. Unlike Case 1, this case demonstrates an early and accurate diagnosis of the patient’s pathology. The rapid referral to the radiologist and neurological surgeon led to immediate and appropriate surgical intervention. However, patients with symptoms similar to this patient’s sometimes are treated with multiple endodontic procedures, extractions, or both. The diagnosis and management of this patient by an oral and maxillofacial surgeon, a radiologist and a neurological surgeon resulted in early diagnosis and treatment of the acoustic neuroma, which led not only to rapid resolution of this patient’s pain, but also removal of serious intracranial pathology.


   APPLYING THE INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 Chronic orofacial pain.
 CASE REPORTS
 APPLYING THE INTERDISCIPLINARY...
 SUMMARY
 REFERENCES
 
Chronic nonmalignant pain disorders often have a cause that is unknown or poorly understood and can lead to profound changes in psychological state, level of functioning and interpersonal relationships. Treatments that are aimed solely at the proposed pathophysiological mechanism of pain production often are inadequate; thus, pain management must be guided toward the psychological and social consequences that the pain syndrome produces as well.21 Functional restoration of the whole person should be the aim of treatment for chronic pain disorders.

The appropriate treatment regimen may vary greatly from patient to patient, depending on not only the pain but also on numerous associated factors. Treatments based on preconceived notions that are not evidence-based can become a moral dilemma for many clinicians. Overtreatment with certain medical and surgical interventions can become problematic when the doctor and patient are both searching for a "cure." In many chronic pain problems, a cure can have many meanings, and deciding what is best for a patient may not involve merely eliminating pain, but also providing a framework within which each patient has his or her own rehabilitation goals. In certain chronic pain disorders, the pain may not be entirely eliminated; however, this should not prevent the clinician from providing adequate care for the consequences of the pain and the accompanying suffering.

It is our opinion that regardless of the level of expertise an individual clinician has obtained, no single specialist is fully equipped to diagnose and manage patients with complex oral, facial and head pain. The case reports here clearly demonstrate the importance of obtaining the expertise of a team of specialists in the early diagnosis and treatment of complex orofacial pain conditions. Dentists are superb at diagnosing and managing orofacial pain and often are the first health care providers from whom patients seek help. However, dentists and patients easily can be fooled into thinking that orofacial pain is odontogenic in nature when, in fact, the origin of the pain is another source. This is owed to a number of factors, including the complex regional anatomy of the head and neck, referred pain patterns, centrally mediated pain and psychiatric comorbidity associated with chronic pain conditions. As a result of the complex nature of orofacial pain and the difficulty in diagnosing it, as well as of the pain’s often being localized in the dental structures, it is common for a patient with this condition to undergo multiple dental evaluations and interventions (such as extractions, endodontic care and apicoectomy).

Some patients who have chronic facial pain have a specific and clear diagnosis, and they are treated within the discipline best equipped to deal with the condition. An example of this is the patient with facial pain stemming from sinusitis who is referred to an otolaryngologist, or the patient with trigeminal neuralgia resistant to medication therapy who then is treated by a neurological surgeon. However, in many patients with complex facial pain, the diagnosis is elusive, and often a number of diagnoses are involved. An example of this is a patient with atypical odontalgia, depression, complex migraine headache, tension-type headache and myofascial disorders who has been treated with multiple interventions. When a patient gives a history of multiple dental procedures, oral appliances, drug treatments and invasive procedures, none of which eliminated the pain, the dentist must search for another source of the pain and make appropriate referrals to specialists with expertise in the interdisciplinary diagnosis and management of oral, facial and head pain. Dentists who evaluate and treat patients with complex, chronic orofacial pain frequently will need to draw on the expertise of specialists in anesthesiology, complementary medicine, general dentistry, endodontics, neurology, neurological surgery, oral and maxillofacial surgery, otolaryngology, physical therapy, psychiatry, psychology and radiology. Figure 5Go shows an algorithm for the appropriate triage and management of the patient with chronic orofacial pain.



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Triage of the patient with complex, chronic orofacial pain.

 
The dental clinician may refer the patient with complex chronic pain to an individual specialist or to a center with multiple specialists who have expertise in pain diagnosis and management. At such a pain management center, patients can undergo a comprehensive interview, examination and evaluation by an interdisciplinary team, usually with one member acting as coordinator. A combined conference should be held in which the pain specialists pool their training, skills and experience to establish the appropriate diagnoses and develop a comprehensive management plan. The management plan must be individualized to meet each patient’s treatment needs. One of the clinicians can act as the primary adviser to the patient and family, explaining the nature of the problem and the recommended course of management. Depending on the outcome of the consultation visit, patients can be followed by the entire team, by an individual clinician or both (Figure 6Go). All patients should be reevaluated by the team at regular intervals, depending on their response to treatment.



View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Example of clinical coordination of a case at a multidisciplinary center for treatment of oral, facial and head pain.

 
Whether an interdisciplinary approach occurs with an individual dental pain specialist in conjunction with outside referrals or in a formal team setting in one center, the most important thing is that the appropriate evaluations are obtained and reviewed by the team leader.


   SUMMARY
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 Chronic orofacial pain.
 CASE REPORTS
 APPLYING THE INTERDISCIPLINARY...
 SUMMARY
 REFERENCES
 
Chronic oral, facial and head pain is common, and appropriate diagnosis and management is a challenging problem for health care professionals. Most patients will first seek the care of dentists because of the pain’s localization in the oral cavity, jaw and surrounding structures. If the symptoms and clinical findings do not appear to be consistent with typical oral disease, or if standard treatments do not alleviate the pain, the dental clinician must consider other, more complex orofacial pain diagnoses. The dental professional should not hesitate to make referrals to key specialists, or a center with an interdisciplinary team, with the expertise to appropriately diagnose and manage chronic oral, facial and head pain.


   FOOTNOTES
 

Dr. Israel is a professor, Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, and the director, The Center for Oral, Facial and Head Pain, Columbia University, 630 W. 168th St., Harkness Pavilion 806, New York, N.Y. 10032. Address reprint requests to Dr. Israel.


Dr. Scrivani is Edward Zegarelli Assistant Professor, Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, and associate director, The Center for Oral, Facial and Head Pain, Columbia University, New York.


   REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 Chronic orofacial pain.
 CASE REPORTS
 APPLYING THE INTERDISCIPLINARY...
 SUMMARY
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Merskey H, Bogduk N, eds., for the International Association for the Study of Pain, Task Force on Taxonomy. Classification of chronic pain: Description of chronic pain syndromes and definition of chronic pain terms—pain. 2nd ed. Seattle: IASP Press; 1994.

  2. Fordyce WE. Behavior conditioning concepts in chronic pain. In: Bonica JJ, Lindblom U, Iggo A, eds. Advances in pain research and therapy. Vol. 5. New York: Raven Press; 1983.

  3. Okeson JP. Bell’s orofacial pains. 5th ed. Chicago: Quintessence; 1995:123–33.

  4. Melzack R, Casey KL. Sensory, motivational and central control determinants of pain: a new conceptual model. In: Kenshalo DR, ed. The skin senses: First International Symposium on Skin Senses. Springfield, Ill.: Thomas; 1968.

  5. Reich J, Tupin JP, Abramowitz SI. Psychiatric diagnosis of chronic pain patients. Am J Psychiatry 1983;140:1495–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  6. Moulton RE. Psychiatric considerations in maxillofacial pain. JADA 1955;51:408–14.

  7. Fields HL. Pain. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1987.

  8. Magni G, Moreschi C, Rigatti-Luchini S, Merskey H. Prospective study on the relationship between depressive symptoms and chronic musculoskeletal pain. Pain 1994; 56:289–97.[Medline]

  9. Bouckoms A, Keith DA, Lavori P, Pava J, Antczak-Bouckoms A, Amaral M. Psychiatric diagnosis in intractable facial pain. Paper presented at: Joint Meeting of the Canadian Pain Society and American Pain Society; October 1988; Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

  10. Leino P, Magni G. Depressive and distress symptoms as predictors of low back pain, neck-shoulder pain, and other musculoskeletal morbidity: a 10-year follow-up of metal industry employees. Pain 1993; 53:89–94.[Medline]

  11. Haber JD, Roos C. Effects of spouse abuse and/or sexual abuse in the development and maintenance of chronic pain in women. In: Fields HL, Dubner R, Cervero F, eds. Advances in pain research and therapy. Vol. 9. New York: Raven Press; 1985:889–95.

  12. Domino JV, Haber JD. Prior physical and sexual abuse in women with chronic headache: clinical correlates. Headache 1987;27:310–4.[Medline]

  13. Wurtele SK, Kaplan GM, Keairnes M. Childhood sexual abuse among chronic pain patients. Clin J Pain 1990;6:110–3.[Medline]

  14. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed. Washington: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.

  15. Lipton JA, Ship JA, Larach-Robinson R. Estimated prevalence and distribution of reported orofacial pain in the United States. JADA 1993;124(10):115–21.

  16. Riley JL, Gilbert GH, Heft MW. Orofacial pain symptom prevalence: selective sex differences in the elderly? Pain 1998;76 (1–2):97–104.[Medline]

  17. Klausner JJ. Epidemiology of chronic facial pain: diagnostic usefulness in patient care. JADA 1994;125:1604–11.

  18. Fricton JR, Schiffman E. Epidemiology of temporomandibular disorders. In: Fricton JR, Dubner R, eds. Orofacial pain and temporomandibular disorders. New York: Raven Press; 1995:1–14.

  19. Schiffman E, Fricton JR. Epidemiology of TMJ and craniofacial pain: An unrecognized societal problem. In: Fricton JR, Kroening RJ, Hathaway KM, eds. TMJ and craniofacial pain: Diagnosis and management. St. Louis and Tokyo: Ishiyaku EuroAmerica Inc.; 1988:1–10.

  20. National institutes of health technology assessment conference statement: management of temporomandibular disorders. JADA 1996;127:1595–606.

  21. Hyman SE, Nestler EJ. The molecular foundations of psychiatry. Washington: American Psychiatric Press; 1993.





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ISRAEL, H. A.
Right arrow Articles by SCRIVANI, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by ISRAEL, H. A.
Right arrow Articles by SCRIVANI, S. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Pharmacology


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS