JADA Continuing Education
CORONARY ARTERY STENTS: REVIEW AND PATIENT-MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS
HOWARD W. ROBERTS, D.M.D. and
SPENCER W. REDDING, D.D.S., M.ED.
 |
ABSTRACT
|
|---|
Background. Coronary artery stents are metallic scaffold devices that physically support narrowed coronary arteries to alleviate symptoms of ischemic coronary artery disease. They are placed during invasive procedures similar to that of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, and patients are maintained with antiplatelet medications to lessen the chances of stent stenosis.
Methods. The authors provide a brief overview of coronary artery stents and discuss the dental management of patients who have received stents.
Conclusions. After stent placement, patients usually are maintained with antiplatelet regimens, which may necessitate choosing medications that do not potentiate their effects. Any discussion as to the possible need for antibiotic prophylaxis of patients with stents largely is missing from the literature. Recent literature, however, indicates that antibiotic prophylaxis, if required, may only be needed during the first few weeks after stent placement.
Clinical Implications. Dental professionals should become knowledgeable about coronary artery stents. Although these devices have a higher success rate than other procedures in alleviating symptoms of ischemic coronary artery disease, some patients are still at risk of experiencing significant cardiac events.
The American Heart Association, or AHA, estimates that atherosclerotic coronary artery disease affects almost 14 million people in the United States.1 As a result of atherosclerotic disease sequelae, more than 400,000 people in the United States and 800,000 people worldwide undergo a nonsurgical coronary artery interventional procedure each year.2 Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, or PTCAmore commonly known as "balloon angioplasty"was introduced more than 20 years ago by Gruntzig.3 PTCA remains limited by two persistent difficulties: acute vessel closure during the procedure and restenosis within the first six months postoperative.4
Angioplastys shortcomings are lessened by the use of stents. Stents are expandable metal scaffolds that function by physically opening and supporting closed or blocked coronary arteries (Figure 1
). Although initially proposed by Dotter5 in 1969, the first animal studies of coronary arterial stent endoprostheses were published in the late 1980s.6,7 Stent placements in humans were performed sporadically under strict research protocols in the early 1980s.810 In 1987, results of the first human stent placement clinical trial were published by Sigwart and colleagues.11 The early indications for stent placement were treatment of restenosis after initial successful angioplasty, management of acute vessel closure during angioplasty ("bailout stenting") and treatment of narrowed saphenous vein grafts.4

View larger version (112K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1. A. Palmaz-Schatz balloon-expandable stent (Cordis Corp.) is positioned at the desired site using a balloon catheter. B. The balloon is inflated, expanding the stent. C. The catheter then is deflated and removed, leaving the implanted stent in place. D. A Gianturco-Roubin Flex-Stent coronary stent (Cook Cardiology) is implanted similarly. Illustration credit Bert Oppenheim, used by permission.
| |
After the publication of Sigwart and colleagues11 clinical trial, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, approved the first phase 1 trial using an intracoronary artery stent.2 In 1993, the FDA granted approval for the use of the Gianturco-Roubin stent (Cook Cardiology) for treatment of acute or threatened closure during coronary intervention.2 In 1994, the Palmaz-Schatz balloon-expandable stent (Cordis Corp.) was approved by the FDA for primary patient treatment.2
In this article, we discuss coronary artery stenting and its complications, use of anticoagulation therapeutics and the management of dental patients with these stents.
 |
CORONARY ARTERY STENTING
|
|---|
In many cardiac care centers, coronary artery stenting now is the recommended treatment over PTCA,12,13 and many cardiac catherization laboratories use stents in as many as 60 percent of all cases.14,15
Internationally, there are approximately 25 different stent designs being tested or used clinically. Of these, seven stents are commercially available for use in the United States.15 Stents may be categorized by their type of delivery system (self-expanding, balloon-expandable),12 composition (stainless steel, cobalt-based alloy, tantalum,12 nitinol, platinum iridium,14 biodegradable-polymeric12) or configuration (tubular mesh, slotted tubes, coils).12,14
The majority of stents approved by the FDA and presently undergoing FDA evaluation are balloon-expandable.14 These stents are mounted on an angioplasty balloon catheter and delivered either with or without a protective sheath.2 There are two major groups of balloon-expandable stents: metallic coils and slotted tubes.
The GRII coronary stent (Cook Cardiology), successor to the Gianturco-Roubin Flex-Stent (Figure 1
), is a balloon-deployed, flat-wire coil stent with a single, longitudinal strut designed to hold the position of the coils while maintaining flexibility.16 This surgical stainless steel stent has an interdigitating coiled structure of 0.127 millimeters and is radiopaque. The Wiktor Coil stent (Medtronic) is a balloon-delivered, radiopaque tantalum single-wire configured as semi-helical coil.16 It is 16-mm long with interval diameters from 3.0 to 4.5 mm. Wiktor Hepamed stents (Medtronic) are the same stents with biologically active heparin permanently and covalently bound to the stent surface.16 The heparin coating is designed to prevent the incidence of stent stenosis after placement.16 Although a heparin-coated stent has shown promising results,17 randomized clinical studies need to be conducted to assess the effectiveness of this coating.4,18
The prototype slotted-tube design stent was the Palmaz-Schatz stent. It has been placed in more than 600,000 patients worldwide and has been used in multiple randomized controlled trials.16 The original Palmaz-Schatz stent was a 15-mm long surgical stainless steel slotted tube. The newest design is the Palmaz-Schatz Crown stent (Figures 2
and 3
). Other Palmaz-Schatz designs that are being evaluated outside the United States include shorter stent devices, articulated designs to improve flexibility, spiral strut designs and stents with covalently bonded heparin coatings.16

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2. Palmaz-Schatz Crown Stent (Cordis Corp.) unextended on balloon catheter. Photo credit CRDUS Inc., used with permission.
| |

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3. Extended Palmaz-Schatz Crown Stent (Cordis Corp.). Photo credit CRDUS Inc., used with permission.
| |
 |
STENT PLACEMENT POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS
|
|---|
Initial enthusiasm for the use of stents was followed by a period of doubt due to a high frequency of reported complications that included stent thrombosis, stent misplacement, suboptimal stent deployment and postplacement bleeding complications, which were due to strict warfarin anticoagulation and aspirin anti-platelet protocols.4
In 1991, U.S. and European investigators initiated randomized trials to compare stenting with PTCA in selected patients who had new-onset atherosclerotic lesions. These trials were reported in 1994 and were the first to show a reduction in the restenosis rate.19,20 Until 1994, early stent thrombosis was a major complication. In 1991, a 20 percent incidence of early stent closure was reported in a multicenter European registry,4 but only up to a 3.5 percent reduction restenosis was reported in 1994.19,20
A new era of reduced stent complications began in 1994 due to two stent protocol modifications: the introduction of ticlopidine as an antiplatelet agent instead of other oral anticoagulation21,22 and the use of a high-pressure stent deployment technique.23 After these modifications were made, controlled studies of elective stenting reported early stent thrombosis rates as low as 1 percent, which suggests a clinical outcome more predictable than conventional angioplasty.4,24
Although more than 1 million stents have been implanted worldwide, long-term follow-up has been reported for less than 0.5 percent of the cases.4 Analysis of the value of an interventional treatment in patients with ischemic heart disease is difficult due to the natural evolution of the disease and the multiple factors that may influence the diseases progression or regression. Also, comparison of clinical studies may be difficult due to differences in study design and methodology.4 Despite these difficulties, clinical studies of postoperative stenting outcomes have been published. Pooled data on one stent design showed a 6 percent death rate and a 4 percent incidence of myocardial infarction, or MI, at 32 months follow-up.4,25 Although stenting in emergent situations is associated with better clinical and radiographic outcomes than PTCA, studies show potentially higher cardiac postoperative complications when stents are placed during an emergent cardiac event vs. elective stenting.2,2529 Specifically, as many as 12 to 20 percent of patients in various studies experienced major cardiac events (for example, MI, death) or long-term adverse cardiac events 60 to 90 days after emergency stenting.2,2729
 |
ANTICOAGULATION AND ANTIPLATELET THERAPIES
|
|---|
Anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapies have been standard adjuncts in the United States during stent placement to prevent postoperative restenosis.2 This regimen consisted of pre-procedural aspirin and dipyridamole, as well as additional heparin during the placement procedure. As part of this protocol, warfarin was initiated on hospital discharge and was continued for up to three months postoperative; aspirin (with or without dipyridamole) is continued indefinitely.2 Several studies, however, now indicate that such an intense anticoagulation regimen is not routinely necessary, and both restenosis and postoperative complications are reduced with a regimen of aspirin and ticlopidine,4,14,2123,30,31 or ticlopidine alone.32
Most recently, developments include in-hospital use of newer platelet antagonists such as abciximab, the use of ß-particleemitting stents, or the use of brachytherapy with either ß- or
- radiation to reduce the rate of stent restenosis.18
 |
DENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS
|
|---|
Dental management for patients who have received coronary artery stents should parallel established management standards of nonstented cardiac patients. Most importantly, the dental professional should be aware that cardiac stenting cannot be considered a "cure" for atherosclerotic coronary artery disease. Although the patient may, in general, exhibit clinical improvement, adverse cardiac events (for example, MI, ischemia, coronary artery restenosis) still can occur after successful stent placement.2,2529
Dentists should consult with the patients physician, cardiologist or both to obtain specific details of the patients cardiac history and present status. For example, dentists should determine if stenting was an elective or an emergent procedure. Patients with stents placed on an emergent basis should be viewed as being at a higher risk of experiencing further cardiac complications than are patients whose stents were placed on an elective basis. Patients who had a stent placed during an MI should be managed using the established guidelines for patients who experienced an MI and did not receive a stent.
The patients medication status should be ascertained. Most patients with stents are maintained on an antiplatelet regimen of aspirin or a combination of aspirin and ticlopidine.18 Such medications may cause a slight increase in bleeding time during surgical procedures. Because these medications do not affect overall coagulation status,33 the bleeding usually can be managed by local measures. Dentists should be judicious in prescribing other medications, such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, that may potentiate antiplatelet actions,33 and they should be aware that ticlopidine has caused acute neutropenia in up to 2.4 percent of patients in some clinical trials.31,33,34
There is little in the medical literature about bacteremias and the possible need for antibiotic prophylaxis with stents,35 but one source advises administering antibiotic prophylaxis per AHA recommendations for up to six months after the stent is implanted.36 This source did not cite a specific rationale for the six-month recommendation; perhaps it is to allow suitable time for endothelium coverage, as that author included stents in the same narrative passage as surgical repair of cardiac defects.36 During surgery, stents are placed into intimate contact with the endothelial wall of the vessel using high-pressure techniques. Recent studies have revealed that once they are embedded in the artery wall, stents are covered with a neointima in as little as 72 hours.37 By 28 to 30 days, the neointima covering each stent has organized into smooth muscle cells and is completely endothelialized.37,38
Due to such rapid adaptation of the stent into the artery wall, it is the authors opinion that patients with stents do not require antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent possible endarteritis from bacteremia-inducing dental treatment. During the first 30 days after stent placement, however, dentists should consult with the patients cardiologists about the need for any antibiotic prophylaxis as per established AHA recommendations.
 |
CONCLUSIONS
|
|---|
Prosthetic stenting of coronary arteries has shown clinical promise in the management of atherosclerotic coronary artery disease. Coronary artery stents are becoming a more commonly used treatment modality in the general population, and dental professionals are likely to treat patients with such devices. Dental management of these patients should consist of the following:
- identification of patients with cardiac conditions and cardiac stents through their medical histories;
- consultation with the patients physician;
- awareness of potential cardiac morbidity;
- awareness of patients antiplatelet regimens, knowledge of possible adverse drug affects and drug interactions, and avoidance of potentiating medications;
- consideration of prophylactic antibiotics for bacteremia-producing dental procedures for up to 30 days after the stent has been placed.
 |
FOOTNOTES
|
|---|
The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not represent the official views of the U.S. Air Force, U.S. Department of Defense or the U.S. Government.
Dr. Roberts is the director, Technical Evaluations, USAF Dental Investigation Service, Detachment 1, USAFSAM, 2701 Sheridan Rd, Bldg. 1H, Great Lakes, IL 60088-5269. Address reprint requests to Dr. Roberts.
Dr. Redding is a professor, Department of General Dentistry; the director of the clinical research facility at The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio Dental School; and a fellow in dental research at the South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio.
 |
REFERENCES
|
|---|
- American Heart Association. Cardiovascular Disease Statistics. Available at: "http://www.amhrt.org/Heart_and_Stroke_A_Z_Guide/cvds.html". Accessed March 3, 1999.
- Pepine CJ, Holmes DR Jr. Coronary artery stents. American College of Cardiology. J Am Cardiol 1996;28(3):78294.
- Gruntzig A. Transluminal dilatation of coronaryartery stenosis. Lancet 1978;1:263.[Medline]
- Goy JJ, Eeckhout E. Intracoronary stenting. Lancet 1998;351:19439.[Medline]
- Dotter CT. Transluminally-placed coil-spring endarterial tube grafts: long-term patency in canine popliteal artery. Invest Radiol 1969;4(5):32932.[Medline]
- Schatz RA, Palmaz JC, Tio FO, Garcia F, Garcia O, Reuter SR. Balloon expandable intracoronary stents in the adult dog. Circulation 1987;76:4507.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Roubin GS, Robinson KA, King SB, et al. Early and late results of intracoronary artery stenting after coronary angioplasty in dogs. Circulation 1987;76:8917.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Dotter CT, Buschmann RW, McKinney MK, Rosch J. Transluminal expanding nitinol coil stent grafting: preliminary report. Radiology 1983;147(1):25960[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Cragg A, Lund G, Rysavy J, Castaneda F, Castaneda-Zuniga W, Amplatz K. Nonsurgical placement of arterial endoprostheses: a new technique using nitinol wire. Radiology 1983;147(1):2613.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Wright KC, Wallace S, Charnsangavej C, Carrasco CH, Gianturco C. Percutaneous endovascular stents: an experimental evaluation. Radiology 1985;156(1):6972.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Sigwart U, Puel J, Mirkovitch V, Joffre F, Kappenberger L. Intravascular stents to prevent occlusion and restenosis after transluminal angioplasty. N Engl J Med 1987;326:7016.
- Eeckhout E, Kappenberger L, Goy JL. Stents for intracoronary placement: current status and future directions. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;27(4):75765.[Abstract]
- Sirnes PA, Golf S, Myreng Y, et al. Stenting in chronic coronary occlusion (SICCO): a randomized, controlled trial of adding stent implantation after successful angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;28(6): 144451.[Abstract]
- Balcon R, Beyar R, Chierchia S. Recommendations on stent manufacture, implantation and utilization: study group of the working group on coronary circulation. Eur Heart J 1997;18:153647.[Free Full Text]
- Holmes DR, Garratt KN, Popma J. Stent complications. J Invasive Cardiol 1998;10:385395.[Medline]
- Serruys PW, Kutryk MJB. Handbook of coronary stents. 2nd ed. St Louis: Mosby 1998.
- Serruys PW, Emanuelsson H, van der Giessen W, et al. Heparin-coated Palmaz-Schatz stents in human coronary arteries: early outcome of the Benestent-II pilot study. Circulation 1996;93(3):41222.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Oesterle SN, Whitbourn R, Fitzgerald PJ, et al. The stent decade: 19871997Stanford stent summit faculty. Am Heart J 1998;136:57899.[Medline]
- Serruys PW, De Jaegere P, Kiemeneij F, et al. A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease: Benestent study group. N Engl J Med 1994;331(8):48995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Fischman DL, Leon MB, Baim DS, et al. A randomized comparison of coronary-stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 1994;331:496501.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Barragan P, Sainsous J, Silvestri M, et al. Ticlopidine and subcutaneous heparin as an alternative regimen following coronary stenting. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1994;32:1338.[Medline]
- Schomig A, Neumann FJ, Kastrati A, et al. A randomized comparison of antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy after the placement of coronary-artery stents. N Engl J Med 1996;334:10849.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Colombo A, Hall P, Nakamura S, et al. Intracoronary stenting without anticoagulation accomplished with intravascular ultrasound guidance. Circulation 1995;91:167688.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Mak KH, Belli G, Ellis SG, Moliterno DJ. Subacute stent thrombosis: evolving issues and current concepts. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;27:494503.[Abstract]
- Debbas NMG, Sigwart U, Eeckhout E, et al. Follow-up 810 years after stenting. In: Sigwart U, ed. Endoluminal stenting. London: Saunders; 1996:415.
- Schuhlen H, Hausleiter J, Walter H, Wehinger A, Elezi S, Schomig A. Risk for major cardiac events with the first 30 days after coronary stent placement: analysis of 2216 procedures in 1621 patients (abstract 3659). Circulation 1997;96(8S):654.
- Sutton JM, Ellis SG, Roubin GS, et al. Major clinical events after coronary stenting: the multicenter registry of acute and elective Gianturco-Roubin stent placementthe Gianturco-Roubin intracoronary stent investigator group. Circulation 1994;89(3):112637.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Almagor Y, Feld S, Kiemeneij F, et al. First international new intravascular rigid-flex endovascular stent study (FINESS): clinical and angiographic results after elective and urgent stent implantationthe FINESS trial investigation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;30(4):84754.[Abstract]
- Suryapranata H, vant Hof AW, Hoorntje JC, de Boer MJ, Zijlstra F. Randomized comparison of coronary stenting with balloon angioplasty in selected patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1998;97(25):25025.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Morice MC, Zemour G, Benveniste E, et al. Intracoronary stenting without Coumadin: one month results of a French multicenter study. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1995;35(1):17.[Medline]
- Hall P, Nakamura S, Maiello L, et al. A randomized comparison of combined ticlopidine and aspirin therapy versus aspirin therapy alone after successful intravascular ultrasound-guided stent implantation. Circulation 1996;93(2):21522.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Elsner M, Peifer A, Drexler M, Wenzel C, Hebbeker C, Kasper W. Clinical outcome at six months of coronary stenting followed by ticlopidine monotherapy. Am J Cardiol 1998;81(2):14751.[Medline]
- Mosbys genRx: The complete reference for generic and brand drugs. 9th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1999: II-214043.
- Molony BA. An analysis of the side effects of ticlopidine. In: Hass WK, Easton JD, eds. Ticlopidine, platelets, and vascular disease. New York: Springer; 1993.
- Dajani AS, Taubert KA, Wilson W, et al. Prevention of bacterial endocarditis: recommendations by the American Heart Association. JAMA 1997;227:1794801.
- Pallasch TJ, Gage TW, Taubert KA. The 1997 prevention of bacterial endocarditis recommendations by the American Heart Association: questions and answers. J Calif Dent Assoc 1999;27(5):3939.[Medline]
- Carter AJ, Scott D, Laird JR, et al. Progressive vascular remodeling and reduced neointimal formation after placement of a thermoelastic self-expanding nitinol stent in an experimental model. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1998;44(2):193201.[Medline]
- Farb A, Sangiorgi G, Carter AJ, et al. Pathology of acute and chronic coronary stenting in humans. Circulation 1999; 99(1):4452.[Abstract/Free Full Text]