The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 93, No 6, 1080-1085.
© 1976 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gift, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gift, H.
Journal of the American Dental Association, Vol 93, Issue 6, 1080-1085
Copyright © 1976 by American Dental Association


Journal Article

Utilization of auxiliaries and attitudes of dentists toward the delegation of duties



HC Gift

Employment of auxiliaries by dentists is high and duties performed by those auxiliaries vary. The auxiliaries' years of experience prior to their present job is low, but tenure in the job is not as low since over 30% have been employed five years or more. Regardless of the category of dentists being considered (type of practice, year of graduation, employment of auxiliaries), the great majority of dentists (over 95%) do not think cutting soft or hard tissue should be delegated. Beyond these two procedures, however, the tables show considerable variation in attitude toward delegation when year of graduation and employment of auxiliaries are considered. Other procedures that a substantial portion of the profession does not believe should be delegated are administering local anesthetic agents; placing and finishing resins, composites, and silicate restorations; placing amalgam restorations; and carving and finishing amalgam restorations. The impact of these attitudes on delivery of care should be directed particularly toward the attitudinal differences occasioned by graduation year and employment of auxiliaries, since the proportion of graduates shifts regularly and employment of auxiliaries is increasing.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-1976 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.