The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 92, No 3, 561-564.
© 1976 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fredrickson, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fredrickson, E.
Journal of the American Dental Association, Vol 92, Issue 3, 561-564
Copyright © 1976 by American Dental Association


Journal Article

Comparison of posterior teeth



EJ Fredrickson

Patients compared the mechanical efficiency of certain types of posterior teeth. Patients, allowed to choose the denture that was most comfortable and the most stable, and that performed the best, all selected the nonanatomic tooth form. Women selected the dentures with the flat occlusal posterior teeth and men preferred the posterior teeth with metal inserts. On the basis of this small sampling of patients treated with anatomic and nonanatomic posterior teeth, I suggest that favorable results would be obtained if nonanatomical teeth were used to construct dentures for all age groups. If, in addition to good function, we can provide an esthetically pleasing,nonanatomic type posterior tooth, we will have achieved our goal in the construction of fine dentures.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-1976 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.