The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 139, No 8, 1080-1093.
© 2008 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow A correction has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hersh, E. V.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hersh, E. V.
Related Collections
Right arrow Pharmacology

RESEARCH

Reversal of Soft-Tissue Local Anesthesia With Phentolamine Mesylate in Adolescents and Adults



Elliot V. Hersh, DMD, MS, PhD, Paul A. Moore, DMD, PhD, MPH, Athena S. Papas, DMD, PhD, J. Max Goodson, DDS, PhD, Laura A. Navalta, BA, Siegfried Rogy, PhD, Bruce Rutherford, DDS, PhD, John A. Yagiela, DDS, PhD; AND the Soft Tissue Anesthesia Recovery Group

Background. The authors conducted two multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, controlled Phase III clinical trials to study the efficacy and safety of phentolamine mesylate (PM) in shortening the duration and burden of soft-tissue anesthesia. The study involved 484 subjects who received one of four commercially available local anesthetic solutions containing vasoconstrictors for restorative or scaling procedures.

Methods. On completion of the dental procedure, subjects randomly received a PM or a sham injection (an injection in which a needle does not penetrate the soft tissue) in the same site as the local anesthetic injection. The investigators measured the duration of soft-tissue anesthesia by using standardized lip- and tongue-tapping procedures every five minutes for five hours. They also evaluated functional measures and subject-perceived altered function, sensation, appearance and safety.

Results. Median recovery times in the lower lip and tongue for subjects in the PM group were 70 minutes and 60 minutes, respectively. Median recovery times in the lower lip and tongue for subjects in the sham group were 155 minutes and 125 minutes, respectively. Upper lip median recovery times were 50 minutes for subjects in the PM group and 133 minutes for subjects in the sham group. These differences were significant (P < .0001). Recovery from actual functional deficits and subject-perceived altered function, sensation and appearance also showed significant differences between the PM and the sham groups.

Conclusions. PM was efficacious and safe in reducing the duration of local anesthetic– induced soft-tissue numbness and its associated functional deficits.

Clinical Implications. Clinicians can use PM to accelerate reversal of soft-tissue anesthesia and the associated functional deficits.

Key Words: Local anesthesia; lidocaine; articaine; mepivacaine; prilocaine; phentolamine mesylate; epinephrine; levonordefrin

Abbreviations: AEs: Adverse events • AFT: Accelerated failure time • FAB: Functional Assessment Battery • FDA: U.S. Food and Drug Administration • H-P VAS: Heft-Parker visual analog scale • IVRS: Interactive voice response system • PI: Principal investigator • PM: Phentolamine mesylate • STAR: Soft Tissue Anesthesia Recovery







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-2008 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.