The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 139, No 6, 697-703.
© 2008 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brennan, M. T.
Right arrow Articles by Lockhart, P. B.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brennan, M. T.
Right arrow Articles by Lockhart, P. B.

CLINICAL PRACTICE

JADA Continuing Education

Utility of an International Normalized Ratio Testing Device in a Hospital-Based Dental Practice



Michael T. Brennan, DDS, MHS, Catherine Hong, BDS, MS, Scott L. Furney, MD, FACP, Philip C. Fox, DDS and Peter B. Lockhart, DDS

Objectives. The authors aimed to evaluate the utility of an in-office international normalized ratio (INR) testing device in identifying patients with INR test values considered out of the normal range for dental procedures.

Methods. This prospective cohort study involved use of an INR testing device to obtain INR test values in the dental office for patients thought to be at risk of experiencing bleeding complications after undergoing invasive dental procedures. The authors recorded demographic, social and medical history data, as well as clinical signs and symptoms of liver disease. The authors considered an INR out of range if it was greater than or equal to 1.4 for patients with potential liver disease and greater than 3.5 for patients receiving warfarin.

Results. The authors completed an in-office INR test for 66 patients receiving warfarin whose INR had not been tested within the preceding 48 hours and 34 patients suspected of having liver disease. Eleven (17 percent) patients receiving warfarin and seven (21 percent) patients suspected of having liver disease had INR values considered out of range. Dental treatment was deferred for eight of 11 patients in the warfarin group who had INR values in the range of 3.6 to 7.4, while three others had dental procedures without bleeding complications. Six of seven patients who had documented or suspected liver disease and an out-of-range INR (range 1.5–2.5) underwent their dental procedures without experiencing bleeding complications.

Conclusions. Use of an in-office INR test indicated a high incidence of elevated INR values. The results of this study point to the importance of obtaining current INR values before performing invasive dental procedures for patients receiving warfarin therapy whose INR values have not been tested recently, and for patients thought to be at risk of developing or having liver disease.

Key Words: Anticoagulation therapy; dental care for chronically ill patients; ethanol; hemorrhage; oral hemorrhage; oral surgery; risk assessment

Abbreviations: CLIA: Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendment. • ED: Emergency department. • FDA: U.S. Food and Drug Administration. • INR: International normalized ratio. • POC: Point of care.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-2008 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.