The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 139, No 1, 53-61.
© 2008 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Loguercio, A. D.
Right arrow Articles by Reis, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Loguercio, A. D.
Right arrow Articles by Reis, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Restoratives

RESEARCH

JADA Continuing Education

Application of a Dental Adhesive Using the Self-Etch and Etch-and-Rinse Approaches

An 18-Month Clinical Evaluation



Alessandro D. Loguercio, DDS, MS, PhD and Alessandra Reis, DDS, MS, PhD

Background. Laboratory investigations have demonstrated that the application of multiple adhesive coats can increase adhesive infiltration, thereby increasing bond strength values. The authors conducted an 18-month, randomized, controlled prospective study to evaluate the clinical performance of a self-etch and an etch-and-rinse adhesive in noncarious cervical lesions.

Methods. Twenty-nine patients with at least two pairs of similarly sized lesions participated in this study. The authors placed 116 restorations in one of four groups: OS2 (phosphoric acid and dental adhesive [One-Step Plus, Bisco, Schaumburg, Ill.], following the manufacturer’s recommendation [two coats]); OS4 (phosphoric acid and One-Step Plus, with four coats); TY2 (Tyrian SPE [Bisco] and One-Step Plus, following the manufacturer’s recommendation [two coats]); and TY4 (Tyrian SPE and One-Step Plus, with four coats). The authors evaluated the restorations at baseline and at six, 12 and 18 months, according to modified U.S. Public Health Service criteria. (Eight of the 116 restorations were unavailable for follow-up.)

Results. The retention rate for the TY2 group (55.5 percent) was statistically lower than that for the TY4 (77.8 percent) and OS4 (88.9 percent) groups. Only teeth in OS4 exhibited a retention rate at 18 months that was similar to that observed at baseline. Marginal discoloration occurred in all groups, and it was statistically significantly worse in TY2.

Conclusions. Multiple adhesive coats significantly improved retention rates.

Clinical Implications. Applying multiple coats of adhesive with the etch-and-rinse or self-etch approach can improve retention rates of Class V resin-based composite restorations, although not to the level of the American Dental Association’s guidelines for dentin and adhesive materials.

Key Words: Clinical evaluation; multiple adhesive coats; self-etch; etch-and-rinse; noncarious cervical lesions







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-2008 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.