The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 138, No 6, 809-815.
© 2007 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hall, N. E.
Right arrow Articles by Shroff, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hall, N. E.
Right arrow Articles by Shroff, B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Periodontics

RESEARCH

Predictors of variation in mandibular incisor enamel thickness



Nathan E. Hall, DDS, MS, Steven J. Lindauer, DMD, MDSc, Eser Tüfekçi, DDS, MS, PhD and Bhavna Shroff, DDS, MDentSc

Background. Interproximal reduction of mandibular incisor enamel often is performed as an adjunct to orthodontic alignment. The authors conducted a study to determine factors contributing to variations in incisor enamel thickness.

Methods. The authors compared enamel thickness between mandibular central and lateral incisors, between mesial and distal surfaces, between male and female subjects (N = 40 each) and between African-American and white subjects (N = 40 each). The authors also evaluated correlations between overall tooth width and enamel thickness.

Results. The authors found significantly greater enamel thickness in lateral incisors, on distal tooth surfaces and in black subjects (P < .0001 for each); they found no differences between male and female subjects. They found that wider teeth were associated with greater enamel thickness (P < .01) but that the amount of thickness varied greatly among subjects (range: 0.44–1.28 millimeters).

Conclusions. Thicker enamel was found on the distal aspect of lateral incisors, in black subjects and in wider teeth. The authors observed, however, that the variations in thickness are not fully explained by these factors alone.

Clinical Implications. If substantial enamel reduction is planned as part of dental treatment, the authors recommend that clinicians use calibrated radiographs to measure the thickness of their patients’ enamel surfaces because of the extensive variation in enamel thickness among and within people.

Key Words: Enamel; incisor; interproximal reduction; malocclusion; mandible; orthodontics

Abbreviations: CEJ: Cementoenamel junction • DEJ: Dentinoenamel junction • IPR: Interproximal reduction







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-2007 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.