The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 138, No 3, 321-329.
© 2007 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leblebicioglu, B.
Right arrow Articles by Mariotti, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Leblebicioglu, B.
Right arrow Articles by Mariotti, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Implants

CLINICAL PRACTICE

A review of the functional and esthetic requirements for dental implants



Binnaz Leblebicioglu, DDS, PhD, Swati Rawal, BDS, MS and Angelo Mariotti, DDS, PhD

Background. The esthetic replacement of teeth has become an important standard for implant dentistry. While defining this goal has not been difficult, the ability to restore implants esthetically has been fraught with obstacles and sometimes has not been attainable. The purpose of this review is to summarize essential anatomical and surgical considerations for cosmetic implant dentistry.

Methods. This article provides a summary of the predominant findings from clinical studies and case reports that help develop implant surgical guidelines for better esthetic outcomes.

Results. Soft- and hard-tissue requirements for placing an implant in an ideal position are defined. The authors discuss the best treatment approaches as well as the limitations associated with esthetic implant placement. They evaluate the available data specifically for the maxillary anterior sextant, since this anatomical region has higher esthetic demands.

Conclusions. Several parameters and various surgical techniques have been developed to manipulate soft- and hard-tissue contours and to control the esthetic outcome for implant-supported restorations.

Clinical Implications. It is essential for practitioners to understand the anatomical basis for and limitations of implant dentistry in the esthetic zone.

Key Words: Alveolar bone; gingiva; dental implant; regeneration

Abbreviations: GBR: Guided bone regeneration







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-2007 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.