The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 137, No 8, 1131-1138.
© 2006 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Xu, H. H.K.
Right arrow Articles by Yen, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Xu, H. H.K.
Right arrow Articles by Yen, J. H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Restoratives

RESEARCH

Development of a nonrigid, durable calcium phosphate cement for use in periodontal bone repair



Hockin H.K. Xu, PhD, Shozo Takagi, PhD, Limin Sun, PhD, Latiff Hussain, PhD, Laurence C. Chow, PhD, William F. Guthrie, MS and James H. Yen, PhD

Background. Calcium phosphate cement (CPC) hardens in situ to form hydroxyapatite and has been used in dental and craniofacial restorative applications. However, when CPC was used in periodontal osseous repair, tooth mobility resulted in the fracture and exfoliation of the brittle CPC implant. The objective of the authors’ study was to develop a strong and nonrigid CPC to provide compliance for tooth mobility without fracturing the implant.

Methods. The authors used tetracalcium phosphate, dicalcium phosphate anhydrous and biopolymer chitosan to develop a strong and nonrigid CPC. They used a powder:liquid ratio of 2:1, compared with the 1:1 ratio of a previously developed nonrigid CPC control. Specimens were characterized using a flexural test, scanning electron microscopy and powder X-ray diffraction.

Results. After 28 days of immersion, the new cement had a flexural strength (mean ± standard deviation; n = 6) of 5.2 ± 1.0 megapascals, higher than 1.8 ± 1.5 MPa for the control (P < .05) and overlapping the reported strengths of sintered hydroxyapatite implants and cancellous bone. This cement showed a high ductility with a strain at peak load of 6.5 ± 1.3 percent, compared with 4.4 ± 1.9 percent for the control; both were 20-fold higher than the 0.2 percent of the conventional CPC. Nanosized hydroxyapatite crystals, similar to those in teeth and bones, were formed in the cements.

Conclusions. The new nonrigid cement, containing nanohydroxyapatite crystals, possessed a high ductility and superior fracture resistance. This strong, tough and nonrigid CPC may be useful in periodontal repair to provide compliance for tooth mobility without fracture.

Clinical Implications. The results of this study may yield the first self-hardening and nonrigid hydroxyapatite composite with high strength and durability and large deformation capability to be useful in the regeneration of periodontal osseous defects.

Key Words: Periodontal bone repair; calcium phosphate cement; nanohydroxyapatite crystals; nonrigidity







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-2006 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.