The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 137, No 6, 783-788.
© 2006 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Botelho, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Chan, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Botelho, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Chan, K.
Related Collections
Right arrow Implants

RESEARCH

A retrospective clinical evaluation of two-unit cantilevered resin-bonded fixed partial dentures



Michael G. Botelho, BDS, MSc, FRACDS, MRD RCS, PhD, Katherine C.M. Leung, BDS, MDS, FRACDS, FCDSHK, FHKAM, Hyden Ng, BDS, MDS and Kingsley Chan, BDS, MDS

Background. The authors conducted a study to examine the clinical performance of two-unit cantilevered resin-bonded fixed partial dentures (RBFPDs) that were inserted at The Prince Philip Dental Hospital, University of Hong Kong.

Methods. The authors recalled patients who had received two-unit cantilevered RBFPDs at least 24 months before the recall examination. The authors recorded the following data: patient’s sex and age, operator’s experience, prosthesis cementation date, endodontic treatment if performed, bone support, tooth mobility, the presence of shim-stock contacts on the abutment or pontic in intercuspal position, and the presence of aproximal axial contacts adjacent to the prosthesis. They also recorded the date of any debonding with subsequent treatment. They asked the patients qualitative questions about their prostheses.

Results. A total of 269 prostheses were placed in 214 patients and had a mean service life of 51.7 months ± 19.5 months standard deviation, with a range of 13.2 to 141.6 months. Of 14 failed prostheses, 12 debonded, resulting in a success rate of 94.8 percent and clinical retention rate of 95.5 percent. No discernable rotation or drifting of the abutments was apparent in any of the prostheses. Overall patient satisfaction with RBFPDs was good, with an average assessment score of 8.5.

Conclusions. The authors observed a 95.5 percent clinical retention rate of 269 two-unit RBFPDs, with no apparent drifting of the abutments. Longer-term follow-up studies are required.

Clinical Implications. Two-unit RBFPDs are conservative and clinically retentive prostheses in the short to medium term.

Key Words: Resin-bonded fixed partial denture; retrospective study; longevity







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-2006 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.