The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 134, No 3, 317-323.
© 2003 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GORDAN, V. V.
Right arrow Articles by WILSON, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by GORDAN, V. V.
Right arrow Articles by WILSON, N.
Related Collections
Right arrow Restoratives

RESEARCH

JADA Continuing Education

Teaching students the repair of resin-based composite restorations

A survey of North American dental schools



VALERIA V. GORDAN, D.D.S., M.S., IVAR A. MJÖR, B.D.S., M.S.D., M.S., Dr.Odont., IGOR R. BLUM, D.D.S., Ph.D., M.Sc. and NAIRN WILSON, Ph.D., M.Sc., B.D.S., F.D.S., D.R.D.

Background. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether North American dental schools teach students to repair resin-based composite, or RBC, restorations and to compare the findings with those from similar European surveys.

Materials and Methods. The authors mailed a 15-item questionnaire to 64 dental schools in the United States, Canada and Puerto Rico. The survey asked whether the school taught repair of RBC restorations and inquired about the respondent’s experience with such procedures. Questions also elicited reasons why schools taught or did not teach repair, information in regard to relevant decision-making processes, criteria for deciding whether to perform repairs and the nature of the instruction (theoretical, practical, preclinical or clinical).

Results. Fifty-two (81 percent) of 64 schools participated in the survey. Thirty-seven (71 percent) of the respondents reported that they taught undergraduate students repair techniques as an alternative to replacing failing RBC restorations. Twenty-seven (73 percent) of these 37 schools reported that such teaching was at the clinical level, while only three schools (8 percent) reported that it was included in formal lectures as part of preclinical courses. The major reasons given for teaching students how to repair RBC restorations were tooth structure preservation and reduction of potentially harmful effects on the pulp. Indications included the correction of marginal defect and marginal discoloration.

Conclusions. More than one-half of the respondents reported that they taught repair of RBC restorations and that patients were willing to accept such treatment. Most schools considered the repair of RBC restorations to be a definitive measure and reported that, on average, they expected a repaired RBC restoration to have a longevity of four years.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Dent EducHome page
S. Tubert-Jeannin, S. Domejean-Orliaguet, P. J. Riordan, I. Espelid, and A. B. Tveit
Restorative Treatment Strategies Reported by French University Teachers
J Dent Educ., October 1, 2004; 68(10): 1096 - 1103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-2003 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.