The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 130, No 3, 424-430.
© 1999 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BROWN, L. J.
Right arrow Articles by LAZAR, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by BROWN, L. J.
Right arrow Articles by LAZAR, V.

TRENDS

TREND ANALYSIS OF DENTAL PRACTICE

RENT AND MORTGAGE EXPENSES: 1989–1995



L. JACKSON BROWN, D.D.S., PH.D. and VICKIE LAZAR, M.A., M.S.

Background. The authors analyzed trends for rent and mortgage, as reported by independent active private practitioners, for the period of 1989–1995. Rent and mortgage were analyzed overall and by different characteristics.

Methods. In the ADA’s annual "Survey of Dental Practice," dentists reported gross billings and net incomes, as well as itemized practice expenses. The authors tabulated survey responses over time to develop trends and compare rent and mortgage expenses for each year. If trends over time were not exhibited, the authors combined multiple years of data to develop more reliable statistics.

Results. Approximately three-fourths of independent active private practitioners reported rent but no mortgage expenses. The percentages of practitioners who reported rent or mortgage was stable over time. The percentage reporting rent only as an expense increased with the number of dentists in the practice, the age of the reporting dentist and the number of office locations. In contrast, the opposite was true for dentists reporting mortgage only as an expense.

Conclusions. The authors found that office rental is more common than is office ownership and that mortgages as a percentage of gross billings and in dollar amounts were similar to rents. They also found that because the cost of office space as a percentage of gross billings decreased as the number of dentists in the practice increased, limited economies of scale may be present in the cost of dental office space.

Practice Implications. There is not a large financial advantage to ownership, so renting is likely to remain an important way to acquire office space. As only limited economies of scale exist in office space expenses, many group practices may choose to rent office space.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-1999 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.