The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 128, No 4, 439-443.
© 1997 American Dental Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Versteeg, K.
Right arrow Articles by van der Stelt, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Versteeg, K.
Right arrow Articles by van der Stelt, P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Imaging
Journal of the American Dental Association, Vol 128, Issue 4, 439-443
Copyright © 1997 by American Dental Association

RESEARCH

Estimating distances on direct digital images and conventional radiographs



KH Versteeg, GC Sanderink, FC van Ginkel, and PF van der Stelt
Department of Oral Radiology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, Louwesweg, The Netherlands.

Digital images produced by direct sensor systems are much larger than conventional radiographic film images because of monitor resolution and digital image file sizes. This difference in size may introduce difficulties when estimating distances (for example, during endodontic treatment). The aim of this study was to compare observers' estimates of distances on digital images with those of conventional radiographs.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
G Li, P. Engstrom, K Nasstrom, Z. Lu, G Sanderink, and U Welander
Marginal bone levels measured in film and digital radiographs corrected for attenuation and visual response: an in vivo study
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., January 1, 2007; 36(1): 7 - 11.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
R Goga, N. Chandler, and R. Love
Clarity and diagnostic quality of digitized conventional intraoral radiographs
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., March 1, 2004; 33(2): 103 - 107.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
G Li, G. Sanderink, U Welander, W. McDavid, and K Nasstrom
Evaluation of endodontic files in digital radiographs before and after employing three image processing algorithms
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., January 1, 2004; 33(1): 6 - 11.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-1997 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.