|
|
||||||||
|
J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 128, No 3, 309-314.
© 1997 American Dental Association | ![]() |
RESEARCH |
This study compared the clinical effectiveness of an amalgam adhesive as the principal mode of retention for large, complex amalgam restorations with traditional pin-retained amalgams. Restorations were evaluated for retention and reinforcement, postoperative sensitivity, marginal adaptation and recurrent decay. At the end of two years, all restorations were completely retained and rated Alfa for each of the parameters evaluated. An amalgam adhesive proved clinically effective as a suitable alternative to pin retention.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. L. Vaught Mechanical Versus Chemical Retention for Restoring Complex Restorations: What Is the Evidence? J Dent Educ., October 1, 2007; 71(10): 1356 - 1362. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. O. Bailey, M. D. Weir, and N. R. Washburn Quantification of Macrophage Viability and Inflammatory Response to Dental Bonding Resins Journal of Bioactive and Compatible Polymers, May 1, 2006; 21(3): 185 - 206. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |