The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 126, No Suppl, 1S-24S.
© 1995 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Journal of the American Dental Association, Vol 126, Issue Suppl, 1S-24S
Copyright © 1995 by American Dental Association


Journal Article

Caries diagnosis and risk assessment. A review of preventive strategies and management




The scientific basis for caries risk assessment, prevention and treatment on an individual patient basis requires further development, specification and continuing validation. Still, current technologies and techniques, taken together, can provide enhanced capabilities over those that have been employed traditionally. Undoubtedly, the clinical tools for carrying out these responsibilities will be refined and expanded in the future in response to the changing clinical profile of caries in the population. For example, bacteriologic testing methods have become easier and more reliable, and will become more widely used. Other effective methods to detect the early, pre-cavitation stage of caries also should become more available in the future. Practitioners will be continually challenged and responsible for evaluating the effectiveness and value of emerging technologies in their practices and in light of their patients' needs. But how can this be accomplished best? Effectiveness claims will be made for new drugs and devices that come onto the market. There are several sources of information to assist the practitioner in making such decisions. The American Dental Association acceptance programs (voluntary) and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration compliance programs (law) provide standards and guidance as to product safety and effectiveness. Without such determinations, the practitioner must judge independently product claims and clinical studies. Marketing materials by themselves (advertisements, videos, pamphlets) may not be sufficient evidence of effectiveness particularly when scientific references supporting claims either are not provided or are inadequate. Peer-reviewed scientific literature in publications of the major scientific and professional associations can be viewed as generally reliable. Changing the way dental caries is managed in clinical practice will require integrating new scientific information and technology into workable clinical procedures. Dental education and third-party reimbursement issues must be addressed also but are beyond the scope of this document. Given that disease patterns are always changing in the population, dentists need to modify practice decisions using risk assessment. Ultimately, the goal for dentistry is that adult patients also will enjoy the same low level of caries experience that many children enjoy today.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Dent EducHome page
American Dental Association Council on Scientific
Professionally Applied Topical Fluoride: Evidence-Based Clinical Recommendations
J Dent Educ., March 1, 2007; 71(3): 393 - 402.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
Section on Pediatric Dentistry
Oral Health Risk Assessment Timing and Establishment of the Dental Home
Pediatrics, May 1, 2003; 111(5): 1113 - 1116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-1995 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.