Due in part to a lack of appropriate training and the incentive of adequate compensation, preventive dentistry in the United States has focused on prophylaxis and fluoride application. Dentistry must shift its attention to developing standardized protocols for "preservative dentistry"--diagnosing caries, assessing and monitoring caries risk, arresting active caries and remineralizing non-cavitated lesions. This article addresses shortcomings in preventive dentistry and proposes a plan for treatment standardization that can ensure optimum treatment and, ideally, lead to adequate compensation.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. J. Whitaker Primary, secondary and tertiary treatment of dental caries: A 20-year case report J Am Dent Assoc, March 1, 2006; 137(3): 348 - 352. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. W. SIMECEK, K. E. DIEFENDERFER, R. L. AHLF, and J. C. RAGAIN JR. Dental sealant longevity in a cohort of young U.S. naval personnel J Am Dent Assoc, February 1, 2005; 136(2): 171 - 178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. W. SELDIN and FOR THE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE, AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOC The future of dentistry: An overview of a new report J Am Dent Assoc, December 1, 2001; 132(12): 1667 - 1677. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. D.B. FEATHERSTONE THE SCIENCE AND PRACTICE OF CARIES PREVENTION J Am Dent Assoc, July 1, 2000; 131(7): 887 - 899. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]