The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 115, No 1, 55-56.
© 1987 American Dental Association
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Houpt, M
Right arrow Articles by Eidelman, E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Houpt, M
Right arrow Articles by Eidelman, E
Journal of the American Dental Association, Vol 115, Issue 1, 55-56
Copyright © 1987 by American Dental Association

Clinical Trial

Autopolymerized versus light-polymerized fissure sealant



M Houpt, A Fuks, J Shapira, A Chosack, and E Eidelman

This study found that 31 months after placement of a sealant, no significant difference was seen in the clinical performance and retention between the visible light-polymerized and autopolymerized materials. Practitioners can use either material without compromising efficacy.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-1987 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.