The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 109, No 5, 759-762.
© 1984 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Journal of the American Dental Association, Vol 109, Issue 5, 759-762
Copyright © 1984 by American Dental Association


Journal Article

Clinical methods for determining dentifrice-cleaning ability. American Dental Association Health Foundation Research Institute




This collaborative study of dentifrice-cleaning methodology and function was conducted to compare three dental stain-grading methods among 300 adults who brushed their teeth for 8 weeks with three specially formulated calcium phosphate dentifrices, which differed in dentin abrasivity. In general, with some difference in sensitivity, use of the three stain-grading methods distinguished among different groups of the population using these three dentifrices. By using the method with the greater level of magnification, a significant difference was detected earlier. The data indicate that there is a linear correlation between dentin abrasivity as measured in vitro and observed clinical stain cleaning. As the dentifrices used in this study were custom-designed and limited to the chemical family of calcium ortho-phosphates, the linear relation between abrasivity and cleaning in this study cannot necessarily be related to other abrasive systems or other abrasion levels. Either of the two study designs, that is, testing after a prophylaxis (stain accumulation) or non-prophylaxis (stain removal), is appropriate for future investigations. However, in this study, greater examiner sensitivity was observed with the design that utilized preformed pellicle stain of known history as the substrate for cosmetic tooth-cleaning.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Adv. Dent. Res.Home page
J. J. Hefferren
Power Toothbrushes: Hype or Science?
Adv. Dent. Res., May 1, 2002; 16(1): 16 - 16.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-1984 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.