The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 107, No 6, 953-956.
© 1983 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, G.
Right arrow Articles by Abbott, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith, G.
Right arrow Articles by Abbott, B.
Journal of the American Dental Association, Vol 107, Issue 6, 953-956
Copyright © 1983 by American Dental Association


Journal Article

Clinical evaluation of periodontal ligament anesthesia using a pressure syringe



GN Smith, RE Walton, and BJ Abbott

Conventional local anesthesia techniques are frequently unsuccessful, particularly for endodontic procedures. Supplementary injections are often necessary; the periodontal ligament injection is useful for this purpose. This study examined the effectiveness of injecting into the periodontal ligament with a pistol-type pressure syringe as a supplemental technique in patients who did not have adequate anesthesia for endodontic therapy. Sixty patients received the supplemental injections and 20 patients were reinjected when the first PDL injection failed. Data were obtained by questionnaire. Percentages were computed and comparisons made by X2 analysis. The conclusions about attaining anesthesia included: --Needle size was not important; overall, 25- and 30-gauge needles were equivalent. --Injecting under strong back-pressure was important; the greatest frequency of success was attained when injecting under pressure. Lack of back-pressure on both mesial and distal surfaces resulted in a significantly lower incidence of anesthesia. Proper positioning of the needle and maintaining this position, to force the anesthetic deep into the periodontium, is apparently an effective way to generate the needed back-pressure. --Strong back-pressure could usually be attained on either or both surfaces. --Reinjection was frequently successful if the first periodontal ligament injection failed. --Overall frequency of success in attaining anesthesia with the pistol-type pressure syringe was 83%. This was determined by including the instances in which reinjection was necessary. --Comparing the results of this study with a previous similar study, the pressure syringe were equally effective for supplementary anesthesia.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JDRHome page
R.W. Edwards and T.W. Head
A Clinical Trial of Intraligamentary Anesthesia
Journal of Dental Research, July 1, 1989; 68(7): 1210 - 1213.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-1983 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.